In a recent development that has sparked intense debate, over 450 students from the National Academy of Legal Studies and Research (NALSAR) in Hyderabad have taken a bold stand against the invitation extended to Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant to preside over their convocation ceremony. This move, which has garnered attention across legal and academic circles, raises important questions about judicial conduct, academic freedom, and the role of universities in upholding constitutional values.
A Student-Led Protest
The students, set to graduate in 2026, have expressed their opposition to the CJI's presence at their convocation in a strongly worded letter addressed to the university administration. Their primary concern lies with Justice Kant's recent handling of a hearing related to police action against protesters during a demonstration in Delhi. During this hearing, the CJI reportedly declined to watch video evidence of alleged police excesses, stating, "We are not interested in videos; we don't have time to watch." This, coupled with his alleged comparison of Indian youth to cockroaches, has left the students feeling disrespected and concerned about the values their university convocation should embody.
Beyond Personal Offense
What makes this protest particularly fascinating is the students' emphasis on the CJI's conduct rather than his position. They argue that inviting him to their convocation would be inconsistent with the values of constitutional rights, access to justice, and reasoned engagement with grievances—values they believe NALSAR stands for. In their eyes, receiving their degrees from a dignitary whose recent actions appear dismissive of police brutality allegations sends the wrong message.
A Broader Concern
This incident highlights a deeper issue within the Indian legal and academic landscape. The students' objection is not merely a personal affront but a reflection of a broader concern about the erosion of constitutional values and academic freedom. By standing up against the CJI's invitation, they are sending a powerful message about the importance of upholding these values, especially in academic institutions.
The Impact on Academic Institutions
The students' representation has not gone unnoticed. NALSAR University, while remaining silent on the matter so far, is undoubtedly aware of the implications of this protest. Similarly, the Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS) in Mumbai recently postponed its convocation ceremony, citing "unforeseen circumstances," but it's hard not to draw a connection to potential protests related to the CJI's visit.
A Call for Reflection
As we reflect on this incident, it raises important questions: How should universities navigate the delicate balance between academic freedom and constitutional accountability? What does this protest say about the relationship between the judiciary and the youth of India? And, most importantly, how can we ensure that our institutions continue to uphold the values they were founded upon?
In my opinion, this student-led protest is a powerful reminder of the importance of critical thinking and the role of academia in fostering a just and accountable society. It is a call to action for all of us to remain vigilant in protecting the values that define our institutions and our nation.
